Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Vaccine again

TRENTON, N.J. - Merck & Co., bowing to pressure from parents and medical groups, is immediately suspending its lobbying campaign to persuade state legislatures to mandate that adolescent girls get the company's new vaccine against cervical cancer as a requirement for school attendance.

The drug maker, which announced the change Tuesday, had been criticized for quietly funding the campaign, via a third party, to require 11- and 12-year-old girls get the three-dose vaccine in order to attend school.

Some had objected because the vaccine protects against a sexually transmitted disease, human papilloma virus, which causes cervical cancer. Vaccines mandated for school attendance usually are for diseases easily spread through casual contact, such as measles and mumps.

"Our goal is about cervical cancer prevention and we want to reach as many females as possible with Gardasil," Dr. Richard M. Haupt, Merck's medical director for vaccines, told The Associated Press.

"We're concerned that our role in supporting school requirements is a distraction from that goal, and as such have suspended our lobbying efforts," Haupt said, adding the company will continue providing information about the vaccine if requested by government officials.

Merck launched Gardasil, the first vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, in June.

Sales totaled $235 million through the end of 2006, according to Merck.

Last month, the AP reported that Merck was channeling money for its state-mandate campaign through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators across the country.

Conservative groups opposed the campaign, saying it would encourage premarital sex, and parents' rights groups said it interfered with their control over their children.

Even two of the prominent medical groups that supported broad use of the vaccine, the American Academy of Pediatricians and the American Academy of Family Practitioners, questioned Merck's timing, Haupt said Tuesday.

"They, along with some other folks in the public health community, believe there needs to be more time," he said, to ensure government funding for the vaccine for uninsured girls is in place and that families and government officials have enough information about it.

Legislatures in roughly 20 states have introduced measures that would mandate girls have the vaccine to attend school, but none has passed so far. However, Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Feb. 2 issued an executive order requiring that schoolgirls get the vaccinations, triggering protests from lawmakers in that state, who may seek to pass a law overturning the order.

The National Vaccine Information Center has been publicizing reports of side effects — mostly dizziness and fainting — in several dozen people getting Gardasil, which is approved for use in females ages 9 to 26. The center, a group of parents worried that vaccines harm some children, questions whether the vaccine was tested in enough young girls.

Officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, however, say that reports of side effects through the end of January don't raise any red flags.

The vaccine also is controversial because of its price — $360 for the three doses required over a six-month stretch. Because of that cost and what pediatricians and gynecologists say is inadequate reimbursement by insurers, many are choosing not to stock the vaccine or requiring surcharges to administer it, increasing the cost for many families and making the vaccine hard to come by.

Merck shares were down in after-hours trading on the New York Stock Exchange, falling 35 cents to $44.15 after rising 22 cents in regular trading to close at $44.50.

---------------------------------------------

So they're shilling through a third party huh? I wonder if this will have any effect on you texas folks.

12 Comments:

Blogger Flawed And Disorderly said...

I need to ask my sister if her daughter has had it since she's 12.

8:36 AM, February 21, 2007  
Blogger carmachu said...

yeah, scroll back and reread the rest of the stuff....

8:42 AM, February 21, 2007  
Blogger Deb said...

When will this stuff end? I think it is great now everyone knows the shots are available if they want them, the government should leave it at that.

9:46 AM, February 21, 2007  
Blogger carmachu said...

I totally agree with that setiment there deb. It scares me merke is playing shell games to hide its lobbying. If you had nothing to hide.....

2:44 PM, February 21, 2007  
Blogger Mel said...

Manadtory vax'ing for an STD. Ugh. It kills me that people will unquestioningly line up to get it. Nobody would be vax'ing my 9yo for an STD.
When it was on the news here in CA, the lead in was "A new vaccine. So why are a few parents are up in arms and don't want their daughters vaccinated against a common deadly cancer?"

Clearly trying to manipulate the situation into looking like the vacine itself prevents cancer. Argh.
My first time at your blog, by the way...hi.

6:02 AM, February 22, 2007  
Blogger carmachu said...

Welcome Mel. Yeah, scroll back through to see 2 other posts on the issue.

Its incredibly manipulatve. COnsidering it only covers 4 out of 100 viruses that actually carry the STD....it doesnt protect against jack shit.

It REALLY irrates me about texas where you have to get a legal document to op out....excuse me, who's the parent here? I dont think you should have to justify you prental discression here.

Sorry, a bit irrated...

8:26 AM, February 22, 2007  
Blogger Mel said...

We selectively vax. My kids are 9 and 3.5. I am in CA. The opt out form doesn't bother me as much as the crap I got from the people in the school office who processed it. And this is your business, how? Y'know? It is a health issue and should be parents' domain. I didn't ask them what prescriptions they and their families take.

When we were in CO, and checking out a private school, I mentioned vax'ing. The lady actually said to me...well, if someone's child isn't fullt immunized, we have a meeting with the other parents. If they are okay with it, then your're fine."
Um, yes, please share it with everyone and let them discuss. Ack. I'm going to go check out the prior posta now.

2:15 AM, February 23, 2007  
Blogger Mel said...

Geez, my typing and spelling were atrocious it that comment. I was all riled up, I guess.

2:33 AM, February 23, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just want to see the next ultra sound...I can't wait to find out bout this baby.....( shhhh but some days I wish I had another one .....)

6:39 AM, February 23, 2007  
Blogger carmachu said...

Mel:

I can see that. Things that effect your kids tend to rile a parent up.

Yup. Its your kid, you business. It really shouldnt be anyone else's business....

Quinn:

Sorry dear, 4 more weeks. You'll just have to hang in there. And I wont even tell your husband you kinda want another one....*grin*

7:27 AM, February 23, 2007  
Blogger Terri@SteelMagnolia said...

If I had a teenager.. I'd want her to get the vaccine....but only if she wanted.

3:30 AM, February 24, 2007  
Blogger carmachu said...

And thats fine, I have no problem with other people's choices if they decide to....but I expect the same if I dont, especially from the government.

7:38 AM, February 24, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home